Sorry I forgot to mention on the archive command:
- I'm afraid there is not currently a way to repack the data to reduce the total Jet database size after archiving the content. So at the moment this feature is not useful reduce the actual size of the Jet databases (it could be helpful with MySQL databases, for instance).
- We internally did't run test with symlinks for the Jet databases.I would avoid it if possible. Even with that, I just run a fast test using a Windows junction for the Jet database and it seems to properly work.