Oscar Posted January 30, 2011 Report Share Posted January 30, 2011 Hi, Figure 35 of the usage guide says "it is very likely a merge is needed after a rebase": Questions: 1. "it is very likely" is vague, Could you list exactly all circumstances under which we need a merge after a rebase? What direction the merge here implies, parent-->child or child-->parent? 2. If merge is a must after rebase, why we need rebase first? How about directly merging from parent branch --> Child branch? Thanks, -Oscar Figure35.bmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Posted January 30, 2011 Report Share Posted January 30, 2011 Hi' date=' Figure 35 of the usage guide says "it is very likely a merge is needed after a rebase": Questions: 1. "it is very likely" is vague, Could you list exactly all circumstances under which we need a merge after a rebase? What direction the merge here implies, parent-->child or child-->parent? 2. If merge is a must after rebase, why we need rebase first? How about directly merging from parent branch --> Child branch? Thanks, -Oscar[/quote'] I have the same confusion. By the way, how can I post a image in this forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psantosl Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 Hi guys, Well, very likely means: - Suppose you start from cset:30 in br:/main - You create br:/main/task0030 from cset:30 - You modify 30 files, one of them is foo.c - You modify foo.c in br:/main too - You rebase br:/main/task0030 to latest on br:/main -> you'll have to merge foo.c!! Is "very likely" because under normal circumstances you won't be doing changes alone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.