tom.peters Posted June 23, 2014 Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 I did not realize that when you remove 'chgperm' from ALL_USERS that it overrides individual users, too! I saw the override warning, but I thought that if an individual user had chgperm (like the OWNER), that would win out. Now I am stuck with a label whose permissions are locked in my own local rep even though I am the owner. Is there any way to get this back? Thanks, Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted June 24, 2014 Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 Yes, review who is the "repository Server" owner, that user is the Plastic SCM root, if it's "ALL_USERS" change it to someone else, for example you. Then, login with the root user and change the label permissions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom.peters Posted June 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 TA-DA! You saved the day! Thanks you. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted June 25, 2014 Report Share Posted June 25, 2014 You are welcome cyber-tom! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom.peters Posted July 2, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2014 DELETE, DELETE So, here's what I ultimately want to do. Once a label is determined to be 'frozen', such as when we decide a release is GA and the label should not move to any other changeset, how do I ensure no one changes the label? My thinking was (and may be wrong) to remove all permissions (except for view, read, and mkchildbranch) from the label for ALL_USERS but keep all permissions for Admins (group we have). Now, being that we are fully-distributed, will that cause issues for ALL_USERS when they replicate into their repository as it did for me? Should I tell everyone to make themselves the rep owner for their own local reps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.