Misieq Posted September 17, 2015 Report Share Posted September 17, 2015 Hi We have straneg observation recently related to SemanticDiff. In our project we use C language co PlasticSCM is trying to apply C semantic. Due to some macro extentions it is not correctly parsing it so semantic structure is not detected correctly. But in such case I was quite sure that all changes will be at least correctly highlighted even if not correctly linked with semantic structure. However recently we have seen case when it was not the case. See attached image. Could you please tell me if such behaviour is normal behaviour or some issue (I guess that some more details about how detected semantic structure are compared could light this situation a bit). If this behaviour is normal than I would like know if there is a possibility to set default comparison method to Textual instead of Semantic (I'd like to use Semantic very much but preparation of our own parser will take some time so till that time I need to be sure that no differences will be skipped). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted September 17, 2015 Report Share Posted September 17, 2015 Hello! is it possible for you to send us both revisions so we can test the scenario and improve the semanticdiffs? If you can share them please email them to support at codicesfotware dot com and they will be kept confidential. The regular text differences are working fine, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misieq Posted September 17, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2015 Hi I got confirmation that our companies signed proper Agreement thus I will send files soon. I will appreciate your feedback. After more closer look I think that changes are detected correctly but highlights are shifted by one line. BTW I propose to make highlights more visible - colour difference between line background and change background is to small it's easy to miss it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 Thank you for your feedback! We'll wait for your files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.