CodingGorilla Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 I have a branch that seems to always want to replicate a couple of change sets, but I'm not sure why, and I'm not sure if this is something to be concerned about. Here: http://screencast.com/t/4MBL7Mz2vod, you can see that I'm replicating CS 358, but it's also including 317 and 318. Then here: http://screencast.com/t/BU0ceamz4mJ, I'm replicating CS 360, but again it's including 317 and 318. This branch almost always includes 317 and 318 when I do a replication (359 actually did not) and we're talking about a max of 15 minutes between replicating 358 and 360. Should I be worried about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 Hi CondingGorilla, can you please check that the changesets 317 and 318 are in your target repository? To do that please check the changeset data information about changesets 317 and 318 in the origin repository. Get the guids for both changesets. Then in the replicated server open the changesets view and paste the guids in the filter. Tell me if it's able to find them, make sure you have a date filter big enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodingGorilla Posted May 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 Ok, here's the interesting part, they don't seem to exist in my local repository (the replication source)! http://screencast.com/t/gCz2pWPTNy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted May 18, 2012 Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 And the replication end without errors? Can you please try to create a replication package of the branch and importing it into the external repository? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodingGorilla Posted May 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 Yea, there are no errors on replication, it always succeeds just fine. You want me to create a replication package from my local machine, and import it into the destination? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted May 18, 2012 Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 Yes, let's see if we force to insert the missing changesets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodingGorilla Posted May 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2012 But the changesets are missing from my local repository as well as the destination repository. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 Ummmm that´s quite strange. Can you please issue the following queries from the workspace pointing to the replication source repository? cm q "select * from changeset where ichangesetid=317" --columnwidth=25 cm q "select * from changeset where ichangesetid=318" --columnwidth=25 Please post me the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodingGorilla Posted May 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 iobjid ichangesetid fidbranch fidrootrevision iparentid scomplete 12716 317 2684 -1 -12656 F iobjid ichangesetid fidbranch fidrootrevision iparentid scomplete 12717 318 2684 -1 317 F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manu Posted May 22, 2012 Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 Ok, I want to see if this changesets are comming from a replica, so, please issue this commands: cm q "select * from object where iobjid=12716" --columnwidth=25 cm q "select * from object where iobjid=12717" --columnwidth=25 This queries are going to show us if they are replicated or not (replicationsource column). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodingGorilla Posted May 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2012 iobjid itype scomment dtimestamp sname fidacl fidowner iguidhigh iguidlow fidreplicationlog 12716 15 5/14/2012 5:24:41 PM 0 4263 8431585602682290611 5753948613301907186 12655 iobjid itype scomment dtimestamp sname fidacl fidowner iguidhigh iguidlow fidreplicationlog 12717 15 5/14/2012 5:40:13 PM 0 4263 -46449005183825442154740441315942195008 12655 This is from the source (my local machine) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.