Jump to content

Upgrading to Version 4


leebrooks0

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

Hi hampsterx,

can you tell us how you are performing the fast-export operation?

It should be straight forward, just cm fast-export yourRep@yourServer:Port and a fast-export.dat file will be created.

Then use this file to perform the fast-import operation in Plastic4.0.

Regards,

manu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just performed a fast-export and import operation and it seems that everything worked fine.

I just had a little problem because i need to give a advancedquery permission in order to perform the fast-export command successfully. (Lost about 1 hour to identify this...)

Another thing is, I build an VM using WS 2k8 R2 to test this command and I was using the Administrator user. The import went well and everything was beautiful, until I tried to update my DBrEx...

It was giving me a error message saying that the user Administrator was "unactive".

I just restarted the service and everything worked.

Just for information. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this may well be the source of my problems...

282 changesets retrieved

282 changesets will be exported

69 merges found

1 labels will be exported

cs:0@/main 10/18/2011 5:46:24 PM is out of order

1 csets are out of order

Changeset 1@/main 1/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.0160000

Changeset 0@/main 2/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 4@/main 3/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 6@/main/app mods 4/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 7@/main/app mods 5/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 8@/main/app mods 6/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 9@/main/app mods 7/282. Elapsed 00:00:00.9830000

Changeset 10@/main 8/282. Elapsed 00:00:03.4320000

changeset 0 is out of order so perhaps its skipped, which would explain why i have everything except the initial import?

--------

get this on import (v4)

Error processing changeset mark 1. Parent cset mark: -1. Parent cset: -1

Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

commit refs/heads/main

mark :1

author tim <tim> 1318910173 +1300

committer tim <tim> 1318910173 +1300

data 29

Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response Pablo! (You're really passionate to be here at 10:09 PM han?)

It's just because I'm really excited about this new version.

I'm trying to migrate my current project to the new version so badly that I forget sometimes that we need to wait a little.

But, what do you mean for "doable" ? :D

Is there another way to do it right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, does this mean that we can expect a seamless upgrade option within a couple of weeks?

That would be really great. It seems like a lot of my complaints about 3.0 have been addressed in 4.0, so I am really looking forward to try it out for real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, does this mean that we can expect a seamless upgrade option within a couple of weeks?

That would be really great. It seems like a lot of my complaints about 3.0 have been addressed in 4.0, so I am really looking forward to try it out for real.

I concur we have been waiting for 4.0 to resolve some issues we've been having and I don't see the logic in upgrading until support is built in. The fast-import/export is in my opinion a hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys,

Yes, the migration path from 3.0 to 4.0 is not as clean as I'd like it to be. You can call it a hack, and I'm the one to blame so, shame on me! :) No, really, I'm the one to blame, so feel free to share your thoughts and frustrations.

That being said, I had some reasons which you can share or not but you know we try to do our best and we're totally committed to our users: you!

We'll use the fast-export/import toolchain. I agree it is not as clean as it should, and we'll try to come up with an even better toolchain, maybe just a "migrator" doing it all for you. I'll try to explain the reasons and the underlying change in 4.0. Ok?

Thanks all for your support and trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...